<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Configure a Basic MPLS Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xpresslearn.com/cisco/mpls-cisco/configure-a-basic-mpls-network/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xpresslearn.com/cisco/mpls-cisco/configure-a-basic-mpls-network</link>
	<description>Solutions to your Networking and Security questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lakunle</title>
		<link>http://www.xpresslearn.com/cisco/mpls-cisco/configure-a-basic-mpls-network/comment-page-1#comment-43003</link>
		<dc:creator>Lakunle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xpresslearn.com/?p=339#comment-43003</guid>
		<description>When or where can i find the part 3 of the series on MPLS network . Excellent tutorials to the body of knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When or where can i find the part 3 of the series on MPLS network . Excellent tutorials to the body of knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xpresslearn Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.xpresslearn.com/cisco/mpls-cisco/configure-a-basic-mpls-network/comment-page-1#comment-37673</link>
		<dc:creator>Xpresslearn Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xpresslearn.com/?p=339#comment-37673</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

If by securing you mean some type of encryption requirement, then yes it would be necessary to use IPSEC in addition to MPLS.  MPLS would only provide a means for separation of traffic, in terms of security.

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>If by securing you mean some type of encryption requirement, then yes it would be necessary to use IPSEC in addition to MPLS.  MPLS would only provide a means for separation of traffic, in terms of security.</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.xpresslearn.com/cisco/mpls-cisco/configure-a-basic-mpls-network/comment-page-1#comment-37663</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xpresslearn.com/?p=339#comment-37663</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.  On an internally-built MPLS network, would it still be necessary to use IPSEC to secure traffic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  On an internally-built MPLS network, would it still be necessary to use IPSEC to secure traffic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

